On May 31 and June 1 in 1916 the British Royal Navy Grand Fleet and the Imperial German Navy High Fleet and clashed off of Jutland Denmark. This was the culmination of twenty years of fleet building and a huge cost in capital. The results were surprising and after 100 years we can learn from it, and not just in military matters.
Military force was projected in this age with guns, the bigger the better. Big guns could throw bigger shells farther and keep your ship out of range of lesser threats. Ships routinely did this, gunboat diplomacy was the name used for this tactic. The United States used it frequently in South America. Britain applied it in the Mediterranean, Asia and Africa. The mere presents of big guns often solved political problems.
To get the big guns there faster became very important, and this created a new role for a new ship. The battlecruiser was just a battleship with lighter armor. The big ships were a balance of speed, armor or defense and guns or offense. The battlecruiser strategy was to engage anything with guns that could not penetrate your own armor and run from anything that could. This makes threat assessment absolutely the most important decision of a Captains life. Jutland pointed this out, at the cost of over 4,000 lives.
In less than three hours Britain lost three battlecruisers, in spectacular fashion. These ships did not just sink, they exploded and sunk. The failure was not one of strategy, but of tactics. When war came and a general engagement was required the admiral of the battlecruiser squadrons sighted the German force after he was in range of the big guns and lost two ships in minutes, a third ship was lost two hours later. British losses were over 3,000 men. The next day a German ship made the same mistake and was also destroyed. The heavy plunging shells easily penetrated the lighter armor and detonated deep within the ship. It is suspected the shell may have penetrated the entire ship and detonated beneath, essentially breaking it apart and creating massive damage to the watertight structures designed to keep it afloat. Fuel, munitions and shells were also detonated in the explosion.
This was a great blow to the doctrines of navies of the day. The lesson was clear that the balance of speed, defense and offense must be maintained, yet in the very next war the battlecruiser Hood, the biggest and grandest ship in the British Navy was lost to one shell fired from the battleship Bismarck. Everyone knew that the Hood needed an upgrade to her armor, but in the decades following the Great War there was never money in the treasury to do that upgrade and when war she was needed at sea.
Hood was obsolete when she was built, and by World War II the battleship was also obsolete. Bismarck, the ship that sunk her was undone by a single Swordfish torpedo bomber, a biplane from a small pathetic aircraft carrier. This torpedo jammed her steering and she could not run from her pursuit. Today some wonder if the supercarriers of the United States are also obsolete, vulnerable to new highspeed torpedoes and hypersonic weapons.
Are we obsolete? Are we upgrading ourselves now in “peace time”? Will we be ready when our call comes? Our self-assessments are very important. What do we need to balance in our lives to survive the coming war? How quickly can you adapt to change?
I sometimes feel like the Hood. I have an MBA and graduated at the top of the class with a GPA of 3.8 and did special projects. I loved that time in my life. I was working full time while I completed this education. I also have a degree in Mathematics. I am a great problem solver. For the last six months I have been looking for work. I am wondering what is out of balance, what do I need to improve on? Can I compete with the young graduates? Can I complete as companies look to outsource to people in Asia?
My competitive skills lie in my intimate knowledge of issues in the United States, my ability to analyze the current situation and forecast the likely outcomes while minimizing risk. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it. I learn from it. The fact that I am looking back at Jutland as well as the crash of 2008 gives me greater value than the typical MBA or the contract worker in Hyderabad.